// monsa vs seeking alpha
Seeking Alpha y Monsa responden a preguntas distintas.
Seeking Alpha is other people's opinions and a lot of data. Monsa is your own criteria, applied without an opinion.
Para qué sirve esta herramienta, y la tabla de abajo, siguen en inglés. Son afirmaciones sobre el producto de otro, citadas una vez y comprobadas una vez, y ocho versiones de una afirmación sobre un tercero son ocho ocasiones de contarla un poco mal.
Para qué sirve Seeking Alpha
Articles, author ratings, quant grades, earnings coverage and a large body of commentary on individual names.
Monsa holds the rules you wrote down and checks your holdings against them every night.
The two pull in useful opposite directions. Reading arguments is how a thesis gets formed and also how it gets talked out of shape - the article that arrives when a stock is down is the one that tells you why it is fine. Monsa never has an opinion about a company; it only has the rules you set before you were invested in being right.
Lado a lado
| Lo que quiere hacer | Seeking Alpha | Monsa |
|---|---|---|
| Read a case for or against a company | The reason it exists. | Never. Monsa states no view on any company. |
| Get a rating on a stock | Author ratings and quant grades. | A fit score against your rules, which is not a rating of the company. |
| Check a holding against what you required of it | Not what it does. | The whole product. |
Cuándo no necesita Monsa
If you want to be told what somebody thinks about a stock, Monsa is the wrong tool and will stay that way.
Monsa tampoco es un bróker, no ejecuta operaciones y nunca dice qué comprar o vender. Las otras comparaciones dicen lo mismo sobre otras herramientas, y una hoja de cálculo llega más lejos de lo que casi todo el mundo espera.
Las reglas escritas mientras todavía recuerda por qué compró algo sobreviven al momento en que el precio le lleva la contraria.